For comparison please make careful observations and make note as to how Ms. Achtem listed 6 Exhibits that are e-mails, and please pay special attention all dates and the dates as you see Ms. Achtem has listed on the copy of the original she filed. Exhibits B1to B6 on her 1st "List of Exhibits" filed prior to Pre-trial. These where the only e-mails in which Ms. Achtem ever provided Mr. Achtem of her intent of documents to be used at Trial being e-mails. These were the only e-mail that Ms. Achtem prepared Mr. Achtem for to be cross-examined on, and Ms. Achtem knew that. Please be sure to make note of the dates of these e-mails to soon compare with Ms. Achtem's 2nd "List of Exhibits"
Then note that were 6 e-mails that where in the begining in the beginning 1st "List of Exhibits"
View How Ms. Achtem covertly placed her Exhibits M to R behind behind Exhibits A to L wich were Exhibits in which Ms. Achtem provided her intent to use at Trial for cross-examination. Ms. Achtem did not inform the courts or Mr. Achtem , that she was going to use Exhibits M to R which were e-mail sent by Mr. Achtem. Mr. Achtem did send these e-mail and would have ben able to answer to them more appropiately only if Just Horner had allowed Mr. Achtem the opportuntity to veiw Ms. Achtem's Documents she brought to Trial so Mr. Achtem could confirm if they where the same e-mails as Mr. Achtem had intentened for use for cross-examination asw Ms. Achtem has stated on her Pre-trial Summary which was titled as a Concise Letter - Pre-trial not side-tracked Mr. Achtem. The dates on the the e-mail Exhibits on Ms. Achtem's "List of Exhibits file prior to Trial
Mrs. R. Sails/(Ms. Achtem), The Defendant's Exhibit M to R.
Exhibit M: {Exhibit 3A]
Read Rhonda Sails's (Fleck) cross examination of exibit M {Exhibit 3B]
Listen to audio Rhonda Sails's cross-examination of Exhibit M{time?]
Read what M. Achtem's response could have been for Exhibit M. If Mrs Sails had not breached sections 6(1), 6(2), 28(1), and 28(2) of the Canada Evidence Act C-5. Or if Justice Horner had prevented me from having view Mrs. Sails's 2nd Bundle of Documents. Or if Justice Horner have not signed and filed the her "Reasons of Judgment", sent out with observing her conduct, and her lacking obervation.{Exhibit 3C]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit N: {Exhibit 3D]
Read Rhonda Sails's (Fleck) cross examination of exibit N{Exhibit 3E]
Listen to the Audio of Rhonda Sails's cross-examination of Exhibit N {time?]
Read what M. Achtem's response could have been for Exhibit N. If Mrs Sails had not breached sections 6(1), 6(2), 28(1), and 28(2) of the Canada Evidence Act C-5. Or if Justice Horner had prevented me from having view Mrs. Sails's 2nd Bundle of Documents. Or if Justice Horner have not signed and filed the her "Reasons of Judgment", sent out with observing her conduct, and her lacking obervation.{Exhibit 3F]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit O {Exhibit 3G]
Read Rhonda Sails's (Fleck) cross examination of exibit O {Exhibit 3H]
Listen to the audio of Rhonda Sails's cross-examination of Exhibit O{time?]
Read what M. Achtem's response could have been for Exhibit O. If Mrs Sails had not breached sections 6(1), 6(2), 28(1), and 28(2) of the Canada Evidence Act C-5. Or if Justice Horner had prevented me from having view Mrs. Sails's 2nd Bundle of Documents. Or if Justice Horner have not signed and filed the her "Reasons of Judgment", sent out with observing her conduct, and her lacking obervation.{Exhibit 3I]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit P {Exhibit 3J]
Read Rhonda Sails's (Achtem) cross examination of exibit P {Exhibit 3K]
Listen to audio Rhonda Sails's cross-examination of Exhibit P{time?]
Read what M. Achtem's response could have been for Exhibit P. If Mrs Sails had not breached sections 6(1), 6(2), 28(1), and 28(2) of the Canada Evidence Act C-5. Or if Justice Horner had prevented me from having view Mrs. Sails's 2nd Bundle of Documents. Or if Justice Horner have not signed and filed the her "Reasons of Judgment", sent out with observing her conduct, and her lacking obervation. {Exhibit 3L]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit Q {Exhibit 3M]
Read Rhonda Sails's (Achtem) cross examination of exibit Q {Exhibit 3N]
Listen to audio Rhonda Sails's cross-examination of Exhibit Q{time?]
Read what M. Achtem's response could have been for Exhibit Q. If Mrs Sails had not breached sections 6(1), 6(2), 28(1), and 28(2) of the Canada Evidence Act C-5. Or if Justice Horner had prevented me from having view Mrs. Sails's 2nd Bundle of Documents. Or if Justice Horner have not signed and filed the her "Reasons of Judgment", sent out with observing her conduct, and her lacking obervation.{Exhibit 3Q]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit R {Exhibit 3P]
Read Rhonda Sails's (Achtem) cross examination of exibit R{Exhibit 3Q]
Listen to audio Rhonda Sails's cross-examination of Exhibit R{time?]
Read what M. Achtem's response could have been for Exhibit R. If Mrs Sails had not breached sections 6(1), 6(2), 28(1), and 28(2) of the Canada Evidence Act C-5. Or if Justice Horner had prevented me from having view Mrs. Sails's 2nd Bundle of Documents. Or if Justice Horner have not signed and filed the her "Reasons of Judgment", sent out with observing her conduct, and her lacking obervation.{Exhibit 3R]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
